Preliminary Study on the Aerial Control Techniques of 20% Cyproflanilide Suspension Concentrate Against Chilo suppressalis in Early Rice

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2024.04.020

China Rice ›› 2024, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 101-104.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2024.04.020

• Varieties & Technology • Previous Articles Next Articles

Preliminary Study on the Aerial Control Techniques of 20% Cyproflanilide Suspension Concentrate Against Chilo suppressalis in Early Rice

CHEN Hong¹(), WU Jiale², YE Xuhao³, FANG Hui¹, TANG Xuejun¹^,^*()

¹Linhai County Agricultural Technology Extension Center, Linhai, Zhejiang 317000, China
²Agricultural Public Service Center of Yongfeng Town, Linhai, Zhejiang 317000, China
³Taizhou City Agricultural Means of Production Co., Ltd., Taizhou, Zhejiang 318000, China

Received:2023-11-20 Online:2024-07-20 Published:2024-07-16
Contact: TANG Xuejun
About author:First author contact:
1st author: lhchenhong@163.com;

20%环丙氟虫胺悬浮剂飞防早稻二化螟技术要素探析

陈红¹(), 吴家乐², 叶徐豪³, 方辉¹, 汤学军¹^,^*()

¹临海市农业技术推广中心，浙江临海 317000
²临海市永丰镇农业公共服务中心，浙江临海 317000
³台州市农资有限公司，浙江台州 318000

通讯作者: 汤学军
作者简介:第一联系人：
第一作者： lhchenhong@163.com；

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to explore the aerial control efficacy of 20% Cyproflanilide suspension concentrate against Chilo suppressalis in early rice, a field experiment was conducted using P100PRO plant protection unmanned aircraft as control tools, with different application rate per unit area and the commercial formulation dosage and set operating parameters in 2023. The results showed that, under the premise of applying the rated commercial formulation dosage per unit area, the control efficacy on Chilo suppressalis did not always increase with the increase of liquid dosage, and the optimal liquid dosage was about 39.00 L/hm². Under the premise of applying the rated liquid dosage per unit area, the control effect on Chilo suppressalis increased with the increase of the commercial formulation dosage per unit area, and the optimal commercial formulation dosage per unit area was about 378.69 mL/hm². The control efficacy after one application could last for about 15 days.

Key words: early rice, Chilo suppressalis, Cyproflanilide, plant protection drone, technological elements

摘要：

为探析20%环丙氟虫胺悬浮剂飞防早稻二化螟的效果，笔者于2023年选用极飞P100PRO型植保无人机，设定了作业参数，开展了不同单位面积药液用量和商品制剂用量的试验。结果表明，在单位面积喷施额定商品制剂用量的前提下，对二化螟的防效并不随着药液用量的增加而提高，最佳药液用量为39.00 L/hm²；在单位面积喷施额定药液用量的前提下，对二化螟的防效随着单位面积商品制剂用量的增加而上升，其单位面积最优商品制剂用量为378.69 mL/hm²，施用1次后的持效期在15 d左右。

关键词: 早稻, 二化螟, 环丙氟虫胺, 植保无人机, 技术要素

CLC Number:

CHEN Hong, WU Jiale, YE Xuhao, FANG Hui, TANG Xuejun. Preliminary Study on the Aerial Control Techniques of 20% Cyproflanilide Suspension Concentrate Against Chilo suppressalis in Early Rice[J]. China Rice, 2024, 30(4): 101-104.

陈红, 吴家乐, 叶徐豪, 方辉, 汤学军. 20%环丙氟虫胺悬浮剂飞防早稻二化螟技术要素探析[J]. 中国稻米, 2024, 30(4): 101-104.

Figures/Tables 5

References 18

[1]	邹宇航, 王俊, 钟秋, 等. 2款植保无人机的作业质量技术指标对比——以雪茄烟叶施药为例[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2022, 50(5):174-177.
[2]	何玲, 王国宾, 胡韬, 等. 喷雾助剂及施液量对植保无人机喷雾雾滴在水稻冠层沉积分布的影响[J]. 植物保护学报, 2017, 44(6): 1 046-1 052.
[3]	张海艳, 兰玉彬, 文晟, 等. 植保无人机水稻田间农药喷施的作业效果[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2019, 40(1):116-124.
[4]	茹煜, 金兰, 周宏平, 等. 航空施药旋转液力雾化喷头性能试验[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(3):50-55.
[5]	徐鹿, 孙杨, 刘宝生, 等. 二化螟对双酰胺类杀虫剂抗性的分子机制研究进展[J]. 农药学学报, 2023, 25(2):257-266.
[6]	周丽琪. 二化螟抗药性监测及对氯虫苯甲酰胺的抗性分子机制研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2017.
[7]	孙杨, 胡妍月, 秦文婧, 等. 2017—2019年江西省二化螟种群对四种杀虫剂的抗性[J]. 植物保护学报, 2021, 48(2):396-406.
[8]	王法安, 李东昊, 余小兰, 等. 不同海拔高度下植保无人机旋翼气动性能[J]. 农业工程学报, 2023, 39(9):25-33.
[9]	资乐, 臧禹, 黄俊浩, 等. 植保无人机飞防助剂与杀虫剂配伍方式对其防治稻纵卷叶螟效果的影响[J]. 植物保护学报, 2023, 50(2):538-544.
[10]	张强, 朱晓敏, 赫思聪, 等. 植保无人机喷施球孢白僵菌制剂防治水稻二化螟飞行参数筛选[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2023, 39(4):789-796.
[11]	程根德, 刘曼. 无人机在农业植保领域应用探析[J]. 合作经济与科技, 2022(13):8-11.
[12]	严羽, 张晓伟, 陈夕军, 等. 3种不同型号植保无人机施药对水稻几种病虫害的防治效果[J]. 天津农业科学, 2023, 29(4):58-62.
[13]	王玺, 贾京京, 张一帆, 等. 8种水稻田常用杀虫剂对2种天敌蜘蛛的室内安全性评价[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2013, 36(3):53-58.
[14]	何晶晶, 郑许松, 徐红星, 等. 农用投入品对黑肩绿盲蝽影响的研究进展[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2013, 35(5):664-672.
[15]	肖达, 郭晓军, 王甦, 等. 三种杀虫剂对几种昆虫天敌的毒力测定[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2014, 36(6):951-958.
[16]	林川尧, 吴建, 邓佳, 等. 添加飞防助剂对植保无人机喷雾在茶园中雾滴沉积分布的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2023(8):12-15.
[17]	方治豪, 窦泽晨, 韩小强, 等. 飞防助剂和施药液量对植保无人飞机喷施雾滴沉积和棉花蓟马防效的影响[J]. 植物保护, 2023, 49(2):143-151.
[18]	石鑫, 周洋洋, 陈奕璇, 等. 多旋翼无人飞机在水稻病害防治中的应用效果[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2021, 41(9):78-80.

Preliminary Study on the Aerial Control Techniques of 20% Cyproflanilide Suspension Concentrate Against Chilo suppressalis in Early Rice

20%环丙氟虫胺悬浮剂飞防早稻二化螟技术要素探析

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 5

References 18

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	ZHAI Jing, ZHAO Liwen, GAO Danna, XIE Shijie, XU Liaoyuan, WU Jiangxing. Preliminary Study on Control of Chilo suppressalis by Nanopesticides [J]. China Rice, 2024, 30(2): 95-97.
[2]	CAO Chunxin, HUANG Hongming, WANG Nuan, LIU Yubing, ZHAO Yongliang, LIU Xinhua. Paddy-upland Rotation Cultivation Technique of “Early Rice - Processing Pepper” [J]. China Rice, 2023, 29(4): 101-103.
[3]	WU Qifeng, WEI Qianqian, XU Qingshan, HUANG Jing, PAN Lin, ZHU Lianfeng, KONG Yali, JIN Qianyu, ZHANG Junhua, ZHU Chunquan. Effects of Foliar Fertilizers on Rice Nutrient Adsorption, Grain Yield and Damage to Chilo suppressalis [J]. China Rice, 2023, 29(3): 84-87.
[4]	LUO Yucong, WANG Ren, ZHANG Yin, LIAO Xin, TANG Wei, ZHONG Kangyu, HUANG Huang, CHEN Can. Effects of Different Planting and Breeding Models on Rice Growth, Chilo suppressalis and Weeds [J]. China Rice, 2023, 29(2): 93-97.
[5]	XU Chunmei, XIAO Deshun, ZHANG Xiufu, CHEN Song, CHU Guang, LIU Yuanhui, WANG Danying. Effects of Lumivia Seed Dressing Treatment on Rice Growth and Prevention and Control of Chilo suppressalis [J]. China Rice, 2023, 29(1): 121-125.
[6]	YU Bin, LI Xinmin, CHEN Zhewen, WU Yu. Effects of Seeding Rate and Nitrogen Rate on Yield of Early Rice Variety Zhongzu 143 [J]. China Rice, 2023, 29(1): 131-133.
[7]	YANG Mei, CHU Jin, SHAO Lingyun, SUN Fuyu, LIU Xinyu, YU Fengquan. Study on the Resistance of Rice Chilo suppressalis to Abamectin in Different Areas of Liaoning Province [J]. China Rice, 2022, 28(6): 94-97.
[8]	WANG Chen, CHEN Jiangfeng, MAO Chengyan, PAN Xin. Temporal and Spatial Evolution Characteristics of Late Spring Cold in Jinqu Basin and Its Impact on Double-cropping Early Rice [J]. China Rice, 2022, 28(3): 70-74.
[9]	LIANG Yugang, ZHOU Zheng, ZHANG Lifeng, TAO Shuhua, RONG Xingzhi, LIU Ye, CHEN Wei, WANG Daming, ZHAO Zhenghong, XU Jingbo. Development Status, Existing Problems and Countermeasures of Early Rice Concentrated Seedling Cultivation in Hunan Province [J]. China Rice, 2022, 28(1): 72-77.
[10]	Weisheng LÜ, Fuliang XIAO, Depeng HAN, Wei ZHENG, Guobin XIAO, Yazhen LI, Tianbao HUANG, Xiaojun XIAO. Short-term Effects of Lime on Decomposition and Nutrient Release Characteristics of Rapeseed Straw and Early Rice Yield in Red Paddy Field [J]. China Rice, 2021, 27(6): 69-73.
[11]	Xuhui WANG, Tongwu SHI, Qiangqiang XU, Pengcheng YU, Jing XIANG. Study on High-Yield and High-Efficiency Cultivation Technique of Early-Late Rice and Broccoli Rotation Production Systems [J]. China Rice, 2021, 27(5): 140-142.
[12]	Yanfeng YU, yongqi YU, Jianhuan YIN, Yusheng LIU. Investigation and Thinking on the Pattern of “Good Quality Late Rice Variety Used in Early Rice Planting” in Jiangxi Province [J]. China Rice, 2021, 27(2): 38-43.
[13]	. Effects of Different Fertilization Methods on Yield Formation of Machine-transplanted Early Rice [J]. , 2020, 26(4): 77-80.
[14]	. Cause Analysis and Control Measures of Large-area Rotten Seedling Caused by Spring Cold in Early Rice [J]. , 2020, 26(3): 10-12.
[15]	. Screening of Early Rice with High Nitrogen Use Efficiency [J]. , 2019, 25(4): 44-46.